There was dependably a probability this was going to happen. Perhaps there was even a careless toying, among those of us who can't presently trust it has happened, with the trust that it would. There's somewhat of a vandal in everybody. A sneaking yearning to explode things for it; notice the smoke, kick around for 60 minutes or so in the scene of end of the world, self-hurt a bit while you're there.
What's more, there's a restricted gutted begrudger in each one of us also. Will we until kingdom come hear our own particular dialect talked in the city of our urban areas? What number of all the more bleeding outsiders with minor sicknesses am I going to have sit tight for at A&E before somebody willhttp://intensedebate.com/people/Mehandidesignsi keep an eye on the lower leg I sprained running in Regent's Park?
Assailing the EU for its administration, its decisions on the state of bananas and the spaces between the rungs of a stepladder, its impedance in our generally culminate legitimate framework, the crooks it has loosed upon our urban communities and won't permit us to send back, has been a piece of the enjoyment of being alive throughout the previous 40 years. It's been similar to undermining to leave home when you're 13. You trust it will unnerve the living hell out of your folks. Be that as it may, just the crazy really do it.
Separation would be a superior relationship. You don't separate just on the grounds that your mate has various qualities you hate and on events makes your life uncomfortable. On the off chance that you are sensible, you see divorce as a measure of final resort. There are numerous strides you can take meanwhile. You may even bring in a prepared middle person. Somebody who won't present you with the coarse Twitter and Facebook options of like/abhorrence, thumbs up/thumbs down.
Here's the specific threat of an in/out choice during a time unaccustomed to unpretentious qualifications. The online networking has diminished all talk to love or despise and this submission gave the brilliant chance to put the contempt part without hesitation.
Which is not to say that different grievances, genuine or nonexistent, wouldn't have done the occupation in any case. All that was required was for some rabble rouser to tag along who either shared those grievances or knew how to endeavor them. In the occasion, it was the favorable luck of the Leave crusade – however the truth will surface eventually how great that fortune truly was – to have both. In Nigel Farage – of the turf turfy, of the brew beery, a man of the general population – pub clumsiness discovered genuine expression. On the off chance that you don't know never to believe a man in a coat with velvet collars (not in vain is it called a "secretive coat") there is no expectation for you, regardless of that he communicates sees you are qualified for hold.
In the event that that makes me a sore elitist failure, well, I have justifiable reason motivation to be and I look without any graciousness on the pop-elitist demagoguery of Boris Johnson. His tubby, cherubic grin of state funded school pessimism, welcoming us to concur with him that nobody ever truly had confidence in anything, has been the ugliest sight these last months.
"Give me a chance to have men about me that are fat," Julius Caesar said, dreading the hazardousness of Cassius' incline and hungry look. David Cameron could have put him right on that one. Risk, he may have let him know, prowls no less in men who are podgy.
The Peruvian author Mario Vargas Llosa as of late called Trump a "comedian" and a "bigot" who was a "peril to the United States". Boris Johnson demands he is no supremacist and refers to his Turkish heritage to demonstrate it (however that hasn't ceased him scaremongering about Turks), yet he is indubitably a comedian and history shows that we have much to fear from jokesters who have the ear of the general population. For reasons covered somewhere down in group brain research, they make finished despots.
That some better men than these contended to stay there is probably. I can't remark on their money related skill. Financial matters is not a science; it is a semi religion: part superstition, part persona, part wistfulness. Brokers dream like other men, the main distinction being that when their fantasies swing to bad dreams we as a whole lose rest. There can be no believing the mumbling of any prelate with regards to cash. May the Leavers' monetary forecasts, in this manner, end up being as cheerful as they guaranteed? It's 50-50. Which implies 50-50 it will all turn out badly, leaving poor people and unemployed significantly more hindered than they were some time recently. One man's fantasy, another's bad dream.
Be that as it may, with regards to outskirts and movement these better men must acknowledge a graver culpability. They didn't redden when promising to recover control of the nation, however the nation was at that point in our control. No attacking power held us hostage. No attack was laid upon our shorelines. We went back and forth with opportunity, talked our own dialect and rehearsed human expressions local to us.
They didn't look askance when their supporters chattered on about "taking my nation back", however they are instructed enough to have perceived in such affirmations the kind of fierce patriotism that shredded Europe a century ago. Each nation, however liberal, has a shadow side, a parsimony of soul. Disgrace on the individuals who went searching for it and, when they discovered it, rooted for it.
Men of recognized insightfulness ought not have empowered the masses, however veritable its discontent, in its little islander little mindedness. You can have your nation and be satisfied to welcome others to it. You can have your nation and still appreciate living somewhere else. On the off chance that the voyaging youthful and the inventive groups of the considerable urban areas of this nation declined to be riffraff energized into patriotism and doubt, it was on account of they know how different one's national loyalties can be, the means by which one can live here and think there, how the creative energy, as well, is another nation, how we don't need to contract into a cluster against the danger of the outside, in light of the fact that we are outcasts and insiders ourselves.
You can, as DH Lawrence said of Connie Chatterley, be both "cosmopolitan and commonplace". The EU, for every one of its disappointments, gave substantial guarantee of cosmopolitan extensive mindedness, an experience out of oneself, to millions until now established in their areas. It was a thought and in addition a monetary reality. To reject that thought is to wither once more into common stations of lack of awareness, bewilderment, and animosity kitted out as patriotism.
Things turn sour after a separation and frequently remain as such. It is uncommon for the gatherings to return tranquilly to a period before they met. An intensity waits on. The individuals who call this our Independence Day, fantasizing of coming back to a never-never time they wedded, when they were free, simple, single and ace of their destiny, are whimsical. There is constantly another terrible relationship, another despot, another heavy hitter. There will dependably be another person who takes our occupations.
This is a piece of the trouble of everything – that the guarantees made will never be kept in light of the fact that they can't be kept. Be that as it may, sadder even than that is the mean soul that now crawls about the nation, feeling insulted and hard done to and venting spleen. Yes, the yawning disparities uncovered by the managing an account emergency ought to have been tended to, and yes, those rewards ought to have gone up on fire. Fizzling that, Cameron ought to have seen a kickback coming and the EU panjandrums ought to have seen it as well and givenhttp://mehandidesignsimg.blog.com/ him progressively when he went bereft of all pride to them. In any case, we can accuse whom we like; the reality remains that England is currently a less open, liberal and generous spot than it was a week prior.
Woman Chatterley's Lover once more: "The upheaval has happened, we are among the remnants." But no delicate trysts in the gamekeeper's house with Nigel are liable to be inevitable. What's more, Boris won't wander that far into the forested areas at any point in the near future.
Afresh, ideals has been stolen with false affirmations. And all gatherings to the enchantment are reduced. The individuals who don't feel a string today will feel a thousand throbs tomorrow.
George Osborne's associates are taking soundings this weekend among Tory MPs on whether the chancellor ought to remain against Boris Johnson to be the new Tory pioneer.
Senior Conservative MPs were reached on Saturday to gage the level of excitement for an initiative offer by the chancellor, who has been everything except quiet following the nation overlooked his recommendation and voted to leave the European Union.
The moves by the Osborne camp became visible as parliamentary partners of Johnson, the main Brexit campaigner and previous leader of London, said they trusted he would proclaim his application early this week.
While his helpers said he had not settled on any choice and was concentrating on consoling individuals after the choice result, it is likely he will make his declaration after the official of the 1922 panel of Tory backbenchers meets on Monday to decide the tenets and timetable for the challenge.
Osborne and the home secretary, Theresa May, are presently seen as potential "stop Boris" competitors after David Cameron reported on Friday that he would venture down in the pre-winter.
A nearby associate of Cameron demanded he would not be a piece of any "stop Boris" crusade either off camera or openly. He likewise focused on that Cameron felt no intensity towards Johnson or Michael Gove. "He is not going to meddle in the administration. Covers who he is and isn't set up to back are wide of the imprint. He needs to be clear – we contended energetically yet at last the nation voted to leave the EU on a major turnout. So there is no sharpness and no recriminations on his part."
Just a couple of months back, Osborne was seen as a probable successor to Cameron, later in this parliament. In any case, a shocking late spending plan and his part as lead player in the Remain battle have harmed his odds. In the keep running up to the vote, Osborne cautioned that leaving the EU would mean calling a crisis spending plan with a specific end goal to slice spending in light of an unavoidable financial stun that would interfere with duty income. The move goad.
On Saturday night, expert Brexit MPs said Osborne had "not a feline in damnation's chance" of winning the authority. One senior individual from the parliamentary party said he would be "distraught" to put it all on the line since it would prompt another mortification. "In the event that he does, it will demonstrate for the last time that he has no political recieving wires by any stretch of the imagination."
Osborne's associates were occupied for input. Johnson is the reasonable top pick, having played a main part in the crusade to leave the EU. He is likewise prevalent with Tory party individuals, who will have the last say after MPs have whittled the rundown of participants down to two in a progression of votes. An individual from the 1922 board said: "I wouldn't say Boris is a shoo-in. He is a Marmite hopeful. What's more, in an authority challenge things can turn out badly. Be that as it may, he is in post position."
Gove, his kindred Brexit campaigner, is thought unrealistic to join the challenge, having said more than once that he doesn't grope to the requests of the employment. A companion of Johnson said he expected the pair would meet inside the following 48 hours to choose their best course of action together. "I think a Boris/Michael dream ticket would be the in all likelihood. Maybe with Michael as Boris' chancellor."
Senior individuals from the gathering are worried that Cameron's choice to venture around the season of the following Tory meeting in October leaves too little time for a legitimate challenge. They need a "delight parade" of driving contenders at the gathering before a vote by the 150,000-in number gathering enrollment.
The chancellor's associates trust regardless he hosts solid backing in the parliamentary get-together. One senior Tory MP said: "George hasn't surrendered trust. He has support in the gathering to get on the vote, despite the fact that I think the participation would doubtlessly bolster Boris."
Treasury sources said the chancellor had spent the period since the choice attempting to constrain the monetary harm from the Brexit vote. He has held discourses with kindred money priests over the world, and in addition other key figures, including Bank of England representative Mark Carney.
Other conceivable hopefuls incorporate junior pastor Dominic Raab and job priest Priti Patel, both driving lights in the Brexit camp. Another MP said: "There is a chance another name will end up being the star of the challenge. That is the thing that happened with David Cameron in 2005. In any case, they would need to beat Boris and that would be intense."
May is seen as the second top pick. Despite the fact that she upheld staying in the EU, she stayed under the radar in the battle, and did not pull in the level of feedback that was gone for Osborne from hostile to EU powers in the gathering.
"Theresa has bounty to suggest her. On the off chance that there was an emergency, a terrorist episode or something requiring an unfaltering hand, would individuals need her or Boris?"
A considerable lot of the UK's chosen http://pregame.com/members/mehandidesignsimg/userbio/default.aspx individuals from the European parliament have pledged to work until they lose their employments as an aftereffect of Brexit, AP includes.
Until the UK formally leaves the union, which could take after two years of arrangements, the nation's 73 MEPs can in any case participate in votes, said an EU representative in Brussels. Some have shown they will keep on voting until the day they leave office, with those from Ukip saying they will go without choices that don't influence Britain.
The present arrangement of UK MEPs, who are paid a fundamental compensation of £5,200 a month after EU expenses, were chosen in 2014 on a turnout of 35.6% and the following European decision is not until 2019. Olga Dziewulska, of the EU Information Office in the UK, said: "MEPs have a law based order until 2019, however their destiny will be chosen in the renegotiation bundle. For the time being, actually, until things are chosen, the UK remains a part and MEPs hold the order."
In the discourse reporting his renunciation, David Cameron incorporated a rundown of the things he was glad to have done as head administrator. I think you coated over by then. So will future biographers of his prevalence. He has quite recently gotten to be one of those pioneers who will be associated with a solitary huge misstep. Neville Chamberlain had accomplishments to his name before settlement. There was more to Anthony Eden than the Suez calamity. Ruler North had a vocation before he lost America. Be that as it may, each of those premiers is characterized by their one towering catastrophe. So it will be with David Cameron, the PM who inadvertently cracked over four many years of his nation's monetary, security and outside arrangement by losing the submission on Europe. That will be the engraving scratched profound on his headstone.
He staked his notoriety and bet his nation's place on the planet on a choice for which his gathering throbbed however general society scarcely clamored. He planned the vote and picked a minute that has ended up being a disaster for the cause to which he turned into an overdue, and in this manner not exceptionally persuading, champion. He decimated his prevalence since he misconstrued the legislative issues and misused his adversaries. The man who touched base as pioneer of his gathering vowing to cleanse its fixation on "hitting into about Europe" has exploded himself over Europe. What's more, conceivably much else other than. With Nicola Sturgeon seizing on the ideal basis for another endeavor to pick up autonomy for Scotland, he may likewise be recognized as the man who disentangled the United Kingdom, accomplishing the one-two punch of removing his nation from one union and breaking an even more established one.
He had no real option except to stop. The Tory party, now during the time spent a takeover by the Brexiters, could never have believed him with the separation arrangements. What's more, how might he be able to have looked his European associate gathering in the eye? Having gravely guaranteed them that he would keep Britain in, they couldn't have considered him important in the immense exertion that will be expected to deal with the outcome.
Watching him put forth his close mournful expression in Downing Street, you needed to squeeze yourself to recall that, a little more than a year back, he had remained in the same spot praising a sudden race triumph, the best for any Tory pioneer in over 20 years. He won last May by pitching himself as the underwriter of soundness. Twelve months on, his legacy to his nation is grave financial instability and wild political febrility. He sought to design One Nation. He leaves his nation clearly split.
This choice was a x-beam of the body politic of the country and it uncovered various cracks in this divided kingdom. Two of its constituent parts voted one way, two the other. London and the greater part of individuals in the huge urban areas were on one side, country and commonplace England on the other. We are a nation starkly partitioned between doing-great Britain and left-behind Britain, between the Britain that is basically alright with globalization and differences and the Britain that feels its nerves and outrage about character misfortune have not been listened to.
It was about class, however it was as much about era. That is maybe the most extreme and disturbing gap. Feel the annoyance of the youthful, overwhelmingly for In, as they are vanquished by Out-voting retired people. Oldsters who voted Out on the grounds that they felt legislative issues had given them down now have their mirror in youngsters who a chance to cast for In and feel their future has been stolen from them.
It further highlighted the gorge amongst parliament and individuals. The majority of the real party pioneers bar Nigel Farage prescribed a vote to remain. More than a large portion of the nation let them know where they could push their recommendation. In the present disposition of fuming skepticism about anything that can be interpreted as "world class" or "foundation", that is not such an astonishment. Nor is it an awesome stun to discover such a variety of voters hesitant to listen to the exhortation of financiers and business analysts. The Inners were over-persuaded that trepidation about the financial results of Brexit was their trump card. Every one of their notices of up and coming end times couldn't talk influentially to the numerous a huge number of Britons who felt that it wasn't a danger for them since they don't had anything to lose. The dismissal of "world class conclusion" went even further. Remain was likewise bolstered by numerous assemblages of supposition that usually score well with the general population in trust evaluations, for example, specialists. They were likewise advised to get stuffed.
All things considered, by simply over a large portion of the nation. The most essential decision made by the UK since 1945 was by a slender edge; 17 million voted one way; 16 million the other. Had 634,751 individuals put their cross in the other box, the result would have been switched. For those on the losing side, that encourages the recriminatory feeling that it could have been generally if just things had been done somewhat another way. That is filling the insurgence by Labor MPs against Jeremy Corbyn.
Some of those divisions were growing much sooner than Mr Cameron touched base at Number 10. His damaging commitment was to give a polarizing center for their demeanor by arranging this choice and doing as such at an exceptionally unfavorable point in the political cycle. His planning was appalling. His renegotiation of enrollment was reported singularly. He set a due date that was out of sync with the requirements of whatever remains of Europe. He arranged the vote at a moment that the EU was not a decent notice for itself. He was nearing his offer by-date http://mehandidesignsimg.blogdigy.com/mehandi-designs-2015-images-improving-your-online-business-with-cheap-seo-makes-wonderful-deal-of-sense-282576 as a pioneer. To exacerbate that, and this I assume he couldn't have anticipated, the Labor gathering was not doing so good to bail him out.
The mortification of a Tory executive would ordinarily be a reason for festivity for Labor, yet there is nothing here to cheer the gathering. Its inability to prepare recent Labor supporters for Remain had a pivotal effect and is freezing its MPs about the destiny that could come to pass for them if another Tory pioneer triggers an early decision. That is the goad for Mr Corbyn's interior adversaries to make their endeavor to unseat him. This places us in the uncommon position of the head administrator being constrained to declare his acquiescence while the pioneer of the resistance is all the while t.
The guardians of youthful kids who kicked the bucket on a dubious cardiovascular ward have talked about their fears that they won't not stretch out beyond the production of an autonomous investigation into their children's consideration.
Faye Valentine and Yolanda Turner have numerous inquiries regarding the treatment their children – who passed on inside weeks of each other in 2012 – got at Bristol imperial healing facility for kids.
The Bristol Review was dispatched two years prior after the University Hospitals Bristol NHS establishment trust was blamed for a list of disregard and abuse of infants and kids with heart issues. It will be distributed on Thursday.
Around 10 families are accepted to make legitimate move against the trust, including seven whose youngsters passed on taking after treatment on Ward 32.
Valentine's seven-year-old child Luke Jenkins passed on in April 2012 and she told the Press Association she was apprehensive about what the Bristol Review would say.
"We are wanting to get some answers since so far we haven't and we have been battling this long for reality to turn out about what really happened," Valentine, from St Mellons in Cardiff said.
"We are attempting to stay positive yet we are anxious too in light of the fact that we simply don't comprehend what will be in the audit."
Turner's four-year-old child Sean passed on in March 2012 from a cerebrum drain after already enduring a heart failure while on the ward taking after complex heart surgery.
"We are trusting the survey will answer our inquiries, illuminate the failings for Sean, give an open affirmation and present to us reality," Turner, from Warminster in Wiltshire said.
"We are trusting the survey has been truly thorough and it will highlight the failings. It is imperative for us that there is an open affirmation of the failings in the unit and what was turning out badly, especially for Sean.
"We stood up openly and the doctor's facility attempted to play down what we were stating pointing the finger at Sean for being mind boggling, guaranteeing their unit was sheltered, when it truly wasn't.
"It is truly essential for us that there is an acknowledgment of the disappointments incorporated into the audit."
The request, which did not hold any open hearings, was authorized by NHS England and led by Eleanor Gray, QC.
The survey inspected care gave to kids inborn coronary illness and the encounters of guardians and carers from March 2010.
It took a gander at all the individual cardiovascular administrations conveyed, both in Bristol, and through centers nearer to the families' homes.
Teacher Sir Ian Kennedy, who has practical experience in the law and morals of medicinal services, went about as specialist counsel.
Turner, 47, with her significant other, Steve, 49, and Valentine, 30, and her accomplice, Stephen Jenkins, 33, together griped to the free medicinal services guard dog, the Care Quality Commission (CQC) about Ward 32.
The CQC completed an unannounced examination and issued a formal cautioning to the doctor's facility about gauges.
A five-bed high reliance unit has now been set up on Ward 32 and the trust dispatched its own particular autonomous audit of pediatric nursing over the healing facility with its discoveries executed.
Already, some had stood up about the "bumbling consideration" of the youthful patients and required an open investigation into what they thought to be "incessantly low models".
Sir Ian was administrator of a broad investigation into kids' heart surgery at the Bristol illustrious hospital, which distributed its report in 2001. The report made suggestions for a more secure, more responsible wellbeing administration.
The trust said: "We are expecting various autonomous reports and discoveries about administrations in the Bristol illustrious healing center for kids in the coming weeks.
"These reports will raise issues about the consideration we gave to various kids. They will be basic about the way we have reacted in the past to concerns and objections raised by a portion of the groups of the kids we have administered to.
"We know we have not generally given the right level of backing to each family. This has been uplifted by the way that in these specific cases the families have been confronting and attempting to adapt to the pitiful demise of their youngster.
"We are extremely sad that we haven't met our own particular exclusive expectations of administer to these families, and that has added to their misery at an unbelievably troublesome time for them.
"We think profoundly about giving the right care to each kid and supporting and including their families in the correct way.
Jeremy Corbyn has sacked Hilary Benn in the early hours of Sunday morning after the Observer uncovered that the shadow remote secretary was get ready to lead an http://mehandidesignsimg.blogkoo.com/mehandi-designs-youtube-finding-cheap-designer-handbags-to-get-yourself-stylish-and-fashionable-495080 overthrow against the Labor pioneer.
Benn said he had been rejected from the shadow bureau in a late-night telephone call in the wake of telling Corbyn he had "lost trust in his capacity to lead the gathering".
He included: "It has now turned out to be clear that there is across the board worry among Labor MPs and in the shadow bureau about Jeremy Corbyn's administration of our gathering.
"Specifically, there is no trust in our capacity to win the following decision, which may come much sooner than anticipated, if Jeremy proceeds as pioneer."
It is comprehended that Benn had brought kindred MPs throughout the weekend to propose that he would request that Corbyn stand down if there was huge backing for a move against him. He had additionally requested that shadow bureau associates go along with him in leaving if Corbyn overlooked that solicitation.
Corbyn educated Benn, the child of his previous coach, Tony Benn, at 1am on Sunday that he was sacking him since he had lost the Labor pioneer's trust, a representative for the gathering pioneer said.
It is comprehended that a lion's share of individuals from the shadow bureau still trust that Corbyn ought to stop, in the wake of a large number of Labor voters disregarding their pioneer's recommendation to vote for Britain's proceeded with enrollment of the EU, and in the midst of the likelihood of an early broad decision.
Benn put forth it clear in his announcement that the Brexit vote had provoked his turn, saying: "At this basic time for our nation, taking after the aftereffect of the EU submission, we require solid and powerful administration of the Labor party that is fit for winning open bolster with the goal that we can go to bat for the general population of Britain."
Released inner Labor party surveying of individuals who voted in favor of Labor in 2015 uncovers that about a third (29%) would bolster an alternate gathering if a general race was held today.
A Labor source said: "MPs and individuals were stressed over their prospects at the following race under Corbyn, yet thought they had four years to turn things around. Presently numerous trepidation they may have only four months if a snap decision is called, so know they should act now to change the pioneer."
Corbyn, talking prior on Saturday at a discourse in London, had recognized thunderings of discontent about his initiative. "Yes, there are some individuals in the Labor party, and the parliamentary Labor party specifically, who most likely need another person to be the pioneer – I think they've made that liberally clear," he said.
His ancestor, Ed Miliband, talking at the Glastonbury celebration on Saturday, offered some bolster, saying Corbyn was not to fault for the disappointment of the remain battle. "I don't think we ought to point the finger at Jeremy Corbyn for the seismic quake. Part of the issue is that Westminster has been conversing with itself excessively," he said.
Sources near the administration demonstrated that Benn had been a stamped man even before the Observer disclosures. The MP for Leeds Central charged his gathering, and disheartened Corbyn, when he made an energetic discourse for British military association in Syria in December.
Gossipy tidbits that Benn would be expelled in a future Labor reshuffle had circled in Westminster for a considerable length of time. In any case, the improvement will be a noteworthy shock to the shadow bureau.
It is yet to be seen whether it will just fortify the resolution of some to dispatch a bound together ambush on Corbyn's administration or quieten down the renegades. One shadow secretary of state recommended that lone a little minority in the shadow bureau now felt any faithfulness to the Labor pioneer.
Regardless of the late hour of the sacking, some Labor MPs rushed to express their worry over the move. Ben Bradshaw, MP for Exeter, tweeted: "The Labor shadow bureau must act now to spare the gathering and for the nation. Else we will never be pardoned."
Ilford North MP Wes Streeting tweeted: "Heaps of good individuals served in shadow bureau to keep the show out and about. There are no more great purposes behind great individuals to sit tight."
The shadow pastor for lodging, Roberta Blackman-Woods, called the sacking "pitiful news in fact", including: "I can't see how Jeremy supposes it will help his intensifying position with the PLP [parliamentary Labor party]."
Liberal Democrat MP Alistair Carmichael noticed that the line would occupy from the Conservative party's own inner strife, tweeting: "Express gratitude toward God Corbyn has sacked Benn. Exactly when media consideration was going to concentrate on Tory parts."
Before news of the sacking broke, both the Sunday Times and the Sunday Telegraph had driven on news of Tory infighting over who will succeed David Cameron, who has said he will remain down as PM and gathering pioneer by October.
Traditionalist MPs who had supported staying in the European Union are trying to discover a competitor who can "stop Boris" – with the previous leader of London and Vote Leave frontman Boris Johnson right now considered the most grounded contender to succeed Cameron.
Nicky Morgan, the training secretary and a conceivable contender for the administration, composes today in the Sunday Times that the need for the following head administrator will be "the undertaking of rejoining our isolated kingdom", and urges party individuals to oppose the allurement "to withdraw to our ideolo.
No comments:
Post a Comment